2022 International Conference on 3D Immersion, Interaction and Multi-sensory Experiences(ICDIIME2022)
May 27-29, 2022 Madrid, Spain
我们征集有关3D沉浸感，交互和多感官体验的原创和未发表的研究论文，包括3D用户交互，协作交互，多模态/跨模态交互和感知，沉浸式VR / AR / MR / XR内容的捕获和创建，实时3D渲染技术，超逼真的渲染，沉浸式界面的可访问性，中介和减少的现实，多感官渲染，配准和同步，用户体验和 可用性。会议出版后提交数据库EI Compendex评审收录！
All papers related to 3D immersion, interaction, multi-sensory experiences and their applications are solicited and welcomed for oral presentation or poster presentation or virtual presentation at the conference. Accepted papers will be published in International Conference Proceedings, which will be submitted for index by Ei Compendex, Scopus, WoS, etc.
Track 1: 3D Immersion & Interaction
◆ 3D user interaction
◆ 3D user interface metaphors
◆ Collaborative interactions
◆ Human factors and ergonomics
◆ Input devices
◆ Locomotion and navigation
◆ Multimodal/cross-modal interaction and perception
◆ Touch, tangible and gesture interfaces
◆ Capture and creation of immersive XR content
◆ Light field coding, mesh and point cloud coding, and transmission
◆ Real-time 3D rendering techniques
◆ Ultra-realistic rendering
◆ Inclusive/Accessible XR
◆ Tracking and sensing
Track 2: Multi-sensory Experiences
◆ Audio interfaces, sound rendering, spatialized audio, auditory perception and psychoacoustics
◆ Visual effects/video processing
◆ Immersive/360° video
◆ Accessibility of immersive interfaces
◆ Diversity and gender issues
◆ Embodied agents, virtual humans and (self-)avatars
◆ Ethical issues
◆ Evaluation methods
◆ Haptic and tactile interfaces, wearable haptics, passive haptics, pseudo haptics, other touch-based UI
◆ Mediated and diminished reality
◆ Multisensory rendering, registration, and synchronization
◆ Perception and cognition
◆ Presence, body ownership, and agency
◆ Teleoperation and telepresence
◆ User experience and usability
◆ Technology acceptance
◆ XR applications not limited to
o Entertainment (e.g., games)
o Art, cultural heritage, education and training
o Health, accessibility, wellbeing, and medical applications
Program at a Glance
The 2022 International Conference on 3D Immersion, Interaction and Multi-sensory Experiences (ICDIIME 2022) will hold a virtual event to facilitate the participation of authors worldwide, given the current epidemic prevention policies of various countries. Physical attendance is not expected or required for authors and presenters, but virtual attendance and presentation are still required.
May 27 9:00AM-5:00PM
Final Registration & Attendance Confirmation
May 28 9:00AM-11:59AM
May 28 2:00PM-6:00PM
May 29 8:00AM-11:59AM
May 29 2:00PM-6:00PM
All accepted papers should be complete, self-contained, archival contributions. All submissions will be reviewed by members of the Program Committee. Submission and reviews for the technical program are managed with Editor One. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for ICDIIME 2022 and present the paper at the conference.
Possible Plagiarism Scenarios
Potentially complicating the effort to identify plagiarism is the fact that each of the above basic factors can be combined with other factors, creating a range of possible plagiarism scenarios. Here, then, is a full list of possible scenarios, starting with the worst case:
1. Uncredited Verbatim Copying of a Full Paper, or Uncredited Verbatim Copying of a Major Portion (more than 50%) within a Single Paper--An instance is where a large section of the original paper is copied without quotation marks, credit notice, reference, and bibliography. This case also includes instances where different portions of a paper are copied without attribution from a number of papers by other authors, and the sum of plagiarized material is more 50%, or Uncredited Verbatim Copying within More than a Single Paper by the Same Author(s)--This includes instances where more than one paper by the offending author(s) has been found to contain plagiarized content, and all the percentages of plagiarized material in each of the discovered papers sum to greater than 50%.
2. Uncredited Verbatim Copying of a Large Portion (greater than 20% and up to 50%) within a Paper.--An instance is where a section of the original paper is copied from another paper without quotation marks, credit notice, reference, and bibliography. This case also includes instances where different portions of a paper are copied without attribution from a number of papers by other authors, and the sum of copying results in a large portion of plagiarized material (up to 50%) in the paper, or Uncredited Verbatim Copying within More than One Paper by the Same Author(s)--This includes instances where the sum of plagiarized material from the different papers would constitute the equivalent of a large portion (greater than 20% and up to 50%) of the discovered paper with the fewest words.
3. Uncredited Verbatim Copying of Individual Elements (Paragraph(s), Sentence(s), Illustration(s), etc.) Resulting in a Significant Portion (up to 20%) within a Paper--An instance could be where portions of original paper are used in another paper without quotation marks, credit notice, reference, and bibliography.
4. Uncredited Improper Paraphrasing of Pages or Paragraphs. Instances of improper paraphrasing occur when only a few words and phrases have been changed or when the original sentence order has been rearranged; no credit notice or reference appears with the text.
5. Credited Verbatim Copying of a Major Portion of a Paper without Clear Delineation. Instances could include sections of an original paper copied from another paper; credit notice is used but absence of quotation marks or offset text does not clearly reference or identify the specific, copied material.
Double Blind Reviewing
We follow a lightweight double-blind reviewing process. Thus, submitted papers must not reveal the identities of authors. However, the author names will be known to the program committee in the rebuttal phase.
Both authors and reviewers are expected to make every effort to honor the double-blind reviewing process. In case of questions, please contact the Technical Program Chairs. Authors should ensure that the submission can be evaluated without it being obvious who wrote the paper. This means leaving author names off the paper and using terms like “previous research” rather than “our previous research” when describing background. However, do not hide previous work – papers must still reference all relevant research, including that by the current authors, so reviewers can evaluate novelty. It is important that authors specify all conflicts of interest with potential reviewers during the submission phase.
Reviewers should not undertake any investigation that might lead to the revealing of authors’ identity. If identities are inadvertently revealed, please contact the Technical Program Chairs.
The Technical Program Chairs will check all submissions for obvious signs of lack of anonymity and may ask authors to make changes and resubmit the paper within 7 days of the submission deadline.